Morphology Data of Serrapinnus zanatae
Identification keys
Abnormalities
Main Ref. Jerep, F.C., P. Camelier and L.R. Malabarba, 2016
Appearance refers to Male; Female
Bones in OsteoBase

Sex attributes

Specialized organs other
Different appearance always different morphology between mature adults
Different colors
Remarks Sexually dimorphic characters were observed in males above 28.0 mm SL; bony hooks on pelvic and anal-fin rays of sexually dimorphic males; in pelvic fins, hooks common and numerous on branched rays, rare on 1st unbranched ray; in anal fin, rays bearing bony hooks hypertrophied, sometimes with fused ray segments, and expanded in sagittal plane; sexually dimorphic males also with hypertrophied and ventrally exposed procurrent caudal-fin rays; furthermore, caudal peduncle slightly arched ventrally in a few preserved adult males (Ref. 119705).

Descriptive characteristics of juvenile and adult

Striking features none
Body shape lateral elongated
Cross section compressed
Dorsal head profile clearly convex
Type of eyes more or less normal
Type of mouth/snout more or less normal
Position of mouth terminal
Type of scales
Diagnosis

Serrapinnus zanatae is distinguished from its congeners by the following characters: premaxillary teeth with 7-9 cusps (vs. 10-12 cusps in S. gracilis and S. littoris, and 3-5 cusps in S. microdon and S. potiguar; spatulate and parallel ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. scimitar-shaped procurrent caudal-fin rays arranged in a semi-circle in S. aster and S. potiguar); incomplete lateral line (vs. complete lateral line in S. heterodon, sometimes also complete in S. sterbai and S. tocantinensis; dorsal fin without markings (vs. black pigmentation on the anterior and proximal border of the dorsal fin in S. notomelas and a faint black blotch on the distal half of the dorsal fin in S. microdon and S. heterodon); dark longitudinal stripe extending from the region below the dorsal fin to the caudal peduncle (vs. dark longitudinal stripe extending from the region anterior to the pseudotympanum to the caudal peduncle in S. sterbai); abdomen without distinctive marks ( vs. abdomen with a black spot on the posteroventral region in S. kriegi); absence of fins rays extended as filaments (vs. unbranched dorsal-, pelvic- and anal-fin rays extended as filaments in mature males in S. tocantinensis); 11-13 ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. 13-16 in S. calliurus, 14-16 in S. kriegi, 17-19 in S. lucindai, and 13-16 in S. micropterus); 16-19 branched anal-fin rays (vs. 19-22 in S. calliurus); 33-36 scales on longitudinal series (vs. 31-32 in S. micropterus); caudal-fin spot oval and horizontally elongated not extending to dorsal and ventral margins of the caudal peduncle (vs. caudal spot usually lozenge, vertically elongated, reaching the dorsal and ventral margins of the caudal peduncle in S. calliurus and S. piaba (Ref. 119705)).

Ease of Identification

Meristic characteristics of Serrapinnus zanatae

Lateral Lines 1 Interrupted: No
Scales on lateral line
Pored lateral line scales
Scales in lateral series
Scale rows above lateral line
Scale rows below lateral line
Scales around caudal peduncle
Barbels
Gill clefts (sharks/rays only)
Gill rakers
on lower limb
on upper limb
total 16 - 18
Vertebrae
preanal
total

Fins

Dorsal fin(s)

Attributes no striking attributes
Fins number 1
Finlets No. Dorsal   
Ventral  
Spines total
Soft-rays total 10 - 11
Adipose fin present

Caudal fin

Attributes forked; more or less normal

Anal fin(s)

Fins number 1
Spines total
Soft-rays total 19 - 23

Paired fins

Pectoral Attributes  more or less normal
Spines     
Soft-rays   
Pelvics Attributes  more or less normal
Position    thoracic  before origin of D1
Spines     
Soft-rays   
Main Ref. (e.g. 9948)
Glossary ( e.g. cephalopods )
Comments & Corrections
Back to Search
cfm script by eagbayani, 17.10.00, php script by rolavides, 13/03/08 ,  last modified by sortiz, 06.27.17